Posted by Jenn on June 27, 2010 under (
Science) |
Permalink
The Botany of Desire: A Plant’s-Eye View of the World by Michael Pollan. © 2002 Random House. ISBN 9780375760396. Paperback. Popular Science. 304 pages. $16.00 US. Source: local bookstore purchase.
A half-cooked book makes for indigestion.
This book was promising. The premise behind the book intrigues — that plants can attract or manipulate humans just like hummingbirds or bees. It is likewise laudable for an author to focus on the history behind ‘ordinary’, often ignored plants like the Apple, Tulip, Cannibas and Potato — showing how ‘extraordinary’ they really are. But that’s where the book’s merits end.
Not only did parts of the book seem poorly researched, but there was a sense of being haphazardly thrown together — i.e. the author kept going round and round saying the same things in different ways, as if he wasn’t sure he’d proved his point … or maybe he just enjoyed his own lyrical voice. The pages dragged on and the reader realizes he/she is still in the same territory as 20 pages previously. What Pollan said in 300 pages could most certainly have been said in 150 … maybe less. One thing is for sure: his editor failed miserably. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by
Teresa on May 4, 2009 under (
Paranormal,
Science) |
Permalink
A New Science of the Paranormal: The Promise of Psychical Research by Lawrence LeShan, Ph.D. © 2009 Quest Books. ISBN 978-0-8356-0877-0. Paperback. Science/Paranormal. 133 pages. $14.95 US. [ Purchase ]
Synopsis
Citing documented cases, he [LeShan] offers the only current view for making a serious study of important subjects like clairvoyance, mediumship, and psychic healing. (excerpted from back cover)
Review
A New Science of the Paranormal includes both a rational agenda for furthering this field known as “psychical research” and anecdotal information in the form of case studies. Psychical research is still very much held back because many view it as an inferior science. This is one of the main points LeShan brings up in the book, that we need to move beyond this thinking and understand that not all sciences can be proven using the same methods. Anthropology, astronomy, geology and others have moved on from this thinking and are still very much excepted as legitimate sciences, so why the backlash in regards to psychical study? Read the rest of this entry »